Parsons Brinckerhoff
Worldwide LocationsContact PBLegal NoticeSite MapHome
PB Websites search Advanced Search
MarketsServicesAbout UsPeople and CareersNews and EventsResearch LibraryProjects
PB Network Email This Page
Go To Other Issues | Contact PB Network | Print This Article 
<< Go To Previous Article | Table Of Contents | Go To Next Article >>
Making Better Communities Through Contextual Infrastructure Planning
March 2001 • Issue No. 49 • Volume XVI • Number 1
Advanced Communications In Transportation
Telecommunications Control of Transit Station Fare Gates
By James Schmid, Atlanta, Georgia, 1-404-870-3253, c/o mjohnson@ogc.itsmarta.com
A low-tech, cost-effective solution met the challenge of transferring several unique systems to one central control point when MARTA transferred the functions of its six zones to one operations center.

This section illustrates the range of communications work that PB does within the transportation sector. It starts with five articles written by staff members on Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA) projects. PB gained much of its early telecommunications experience working on MARTA, the company’s longest-term project. Our more current MARTA work involves cutting edge technology involving voice, data and video networks and communications, and the infrastructure that makes it all possible.

MARTA provides rail, bus and
para-transit service to Atlanta, Georgia and two contiguous counties, including the area’s regional airport. It consists of a 73.1 km (45.4-mile) multitrack rail system with 36 passenger stations, two rail yards and plans for another, three bus garages and several support facilities. PB has been involved in MARTA projects for more than 30 years as a senior member of the general engineering consultant joint venture to MARTA known as Parsons Brinckerhoff Tudor – Turner Associates (PBT-TA). Our support began with conceptual design and has continued through installation, operation, several expansions and some renovations.
MARTA’s rail service is divided into six zones, each of which had, until recently, a center where police, patron assistance and elevator phones were routed to zone center operators. Other functions of the zone centers included the monitoring of station security cameras and control of station fare gates and public address systems.

MARTA recently completed a project whereby the zone centers were closed and many of their functions were moved to one central operations center, which came to be called the Police Operations Center (POC). This project required redirecting the fare gate control from six different locations to one location serving 36 stations.

The Problem

The MARTA rail station fare gates had always been controlled by zone center operators who could open one gate at each entrance to the different stations within the zone and who could also issue bus transfers. The fare gates would perform these two actions upon sensing a short circuit signal of a specified duration on two of its input leads. A short of one duration would open the fare gate and a short of a longer duration would cause the gate to issue a transfer.

The operators controlled these actions by utilizing auxiliary outputs from the closed circuit television (CCTV) system controllers at each station. After an operator had pressed a button on his or her console to either open a gate or issue a bus transfer, one of the CCTV controllers at the appropriate station would sense the request and issue the proper command to the fare gates. (The CCTV controllers control the fare gates and the cameras.) Because the rail stations were built over a period of approximately 20 years, however, the CCTV systems at each station differed in their technology and implementation of these commands. Therefore, transferring this control that was being carried out by several unique systems to one central control point was a challenge.

Investigation and Resolution

The various CCTV controllers in each zone use proprietary protocols to control the CCTV cameras (pan, tilt, zoom) and the auxiliary outputs, which included controlling the fare gates. We investigated three options for transferring control of the fare gates to a single location.

Option 1: Replacing CCTV Controllers. More than 50 percent of the CCTV controllers would have had to be replaced or substantially modified to provide control of the fare gates from a single point using the CCTV system. This option was not used because it proved to be less cost-effective than Option 3.

Option 2: Programmable Logic Controllers. Deploying a programmable logic controller (PLC) at each station would provide a short upon receiving a command from the POC. This option would require:

  • Development and procurement of the application specific PLCs
  • Provision of power to each PLC
  • Installation of wiring to each station to provide communications to the PLCs from the POC.
This option proved to be relatively costly due to the development of the PLCs and the installation of additional circuits that would be required.


MARTA Central Control Atlanta, Georgia
Option 3. Dual-Tone Multi-frequency Decoders. The third option, which was implemented, utilized off-the-shelf dual-tone multi-frequency (DTMF) decoders to control the gates. A DTMF decoder can be programmed to provide a short for a specified duration upon receiving a certain DTMF code over, for example, a phone line.

Requests for entrance through the fare gates or issuance of a transfer typically come from patrons whose fare card is not being read or who have lost their ride token in the fare gates. These patrons call the POC on the patron assist phones located at each station for either entry through the gate or a bus transfer. At this point, the operator at the POC is on the phone line to that station. When the operator enters the proper code through the telephone keypad, the DTMF decoder’s relays are energized to exercise the requested fare gate operation (pass through or transfer issuance).

The input of the DTMF decoder is spliced to the existing patron assist phone circuit. The outputs of the DTMF decoders were spliced directly into the input control lines of the fare gates. The DTMF decoders used 120-vac power, which was readily available in all of the train control rooms.

Conclusion

The installation of the DTMF decoders proved to be the most cost-effective solution to relocating the control of the fare gates from six different centers using different control protocols to one central location. The DTMF decoders are small, simple boxes with numerous outputs so that two could typically control all the fare gates at a station. Because control of the DTMF decoders occurs via the phone lines, no new circuits had to be installed.

This project showed that using off-the-shelf technology and existing resources proved to be a more cost-effective approach to solving certain problems than developing a new application- specific device.

Jim Schmid is a communications engineer who has been with PBT-TA in Atlanta, Georgia for approximately two years. He has worked in the cellular industry for several years and as an avionics integration engineer in the aerospace industry with a specialty in communications systems. Jim was part of the team that provided cellular communications for the 1996 Olympics.
<< Go To Previous Article | Table Of Contents | Go To Next Article >>
Go To Other Issues | Contact PB Network | Print This Article 
Markets  |  Services  |  About Us  |  People + Careers  |  News + Events  |  Research Library  |  Projects
Worldwide Locations  |  Contact PB  |  Legal Notice  |  Site Map  |  Home
© Parsons Brinckerhoff