Parsons Brinckerhoff
Worldwide LocationsContact PBLegal NoticeSite MapHome
PB Websites search Advanced Search
MarketsServicesAbout UsPeople and CareersNews and EventsResearch LibraryProjects
PB Network Email This Page
Go To Other Issues | Contact PB Network | Print This Article 
<< Go To Previous Article | Table Of Contents | Go To Next Article >>
Communications Systems/Network
September 1999 • Issue No. 45 • Volume XIII • Number 2
Communications in Public and Private Industry
Optical Fibre Communication for Onshore Oil and Gas Production Field
By Kwok-Hong Mak, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, England, 44-191-226-2253, makk@pbeurope.co
Optical fibre continues to be incorporated into more and more communication designs as an alternative to traditional communications systems, such as radio. Electrical utilities in particular are taking advantage of using their overhead power line systems either as communication bearers or as a means of mounting the optical fibre cable system.

In November 1998, we were appointed by a client to carry out a conceptual study of a supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system for an onshore oil and gas production field. As part of the conceptual study, we performed detailed technical and cost evaluations of two principal communication options—radio and optical fibre.

The optical fibre option involved using existing power transmission and distribution infrastructures to support optical fibre cables. This approach provides secure and reliable communication links and can reduce installation and maintenance costs significantly.

Although the study and our findings were specific for our client’s onshore oil field, the principles used are equally applicable to any electrical utility that is considering using its overhead power lines as either communication bearers or as a means of mounting the optical fibre cable system.

Overview of an Oil Field Operations

Each oil field generally comprises a number of oil wells, water supply wells, remote degassing stations and central processing facilities. Oil from wells is collected within each field by pipeline at the remote degassing stations. At each station, a test separator tests samples from individual wells for oil, gas and water content. After testing, the sampled oil, gas and water are aggregated with the main flow. The main flow is then aggregated and passed by bulk pipelines to a central degassing station where oil, gas and water are separated by a three-stage separation process.

Oil is collected under pressure at each oil well in the field. As oil is extracted, the pressure in the underground “reservoir” lowers, so water is injected into the rock strata below the oil at the edges of the oil field in order to maintain reservoir pressure. This water comes from water supply wells at the field, each of which is associated with a “cluster” of water injection wells. At each water supply well, water is extracted from rock strata at approximately 1500 m (4,900 feet) by a submersible pump. A surface pump is then used to boost the water pressure in the supply main to the injection wells.

The majority of the water supply wells and remote degassing stations are located around the perimeter of the oilfield. Power is supplied to these locations via the 33 kV overhead power line system.

We were commissioned to look at a SCADA system that had been installed at the oil field in 1986 to monitor the surface pump status and some other operational parameters associated with the water supply wells and remote degassing stations. A radio-based communication system operating in the 450 MHz frequency band was used to transmit SCADA data. Frequently, the SCADA system, now out of service, had exhibited poor performance. The problems were thought to be due to radio transmission problems.

A new state-of-the-art water injection SCADA system to be installed at this oil field will meet the client’s present-day operational requirements. It will consist of a master station at the Central Facilities and remote terminal units (RTUs) at the water supply wells and remote degassing stations.

Evaluation of Radio Option

Radio waves in the UHF (ultra high frequency) frequency range (300 - 3,000 MHz) are used widely for speech and data communications. The two primary merits of radio systems are that no physical connection (such as wire) is required and capital costs are generally lower than those of equivalent cable systems if large numbers of very tall radio antenna supporting structures are not involved.

There are fundamental problems in the initial planning of radio systems, however, including the following:

  • Difficulty obtaining suitable radio frequency assignments
  • Possible interference from other nearby radio systems
  • Problems with propagation, including path loss and possible fading effects
  • “Line-of-sight” route limitations, which could mean costly tower or mast structures for transmission over hilly terrain
  • Electromagnetic interference
  • Possible impact on performance by atmospheric conditions.
Nevertheless, in suitable circumstances, a point-to-multi-point polling radio system can provide an economic solution for the transmission of telecontrol and telemetering signals. But, was this option suitable for the oil field concerned?

At this particular oil field, all the water supply well clusters and remote degassing stations lie within a 20-km (12-mile) radius of the radio base station site. The intervening terrain is undulating with sand dunes exceeding 50 m (165 feet) in height, however, so we had to calculate the radio path profiles between the base station antenna and each of the remote sites. The purpose was to determine the minimum antenna heights needed to achieve an unobstructed line of sight, based on a Fresnel zone clearance of 0.6. A fade margin of 40 dB was also used for obtaining an availability figure of 99.99 percent for the radio links.


Figure 1: Proposed UHF Radio Telemetry System for SCADA Data
We found that the required antenna height at a significant number of remote sites is dependent on the height at which the antenna is mounted at the central site. The higher the antenna is mounted at the central site, however, the more prone it will be to external interference from nearby radio systems. With a new, 90-m (295-foot) -high radio tower at the central site, only nine remote sites would require antenna heights of between 30 m (98 feet) and 53 m (174 feet). The absolute minimum height for remote site antennae is considered to be 20 m (66 feet), however. This height is required to ensure an unobstructed line of sight operation at the oil field, where there is a regular presence of ground fog.

Figure 1 shows the proposed radio telemetry system, comprising a radio base station at the oil field central site and a remote radio terminal at each water supply well and remote degassing station. The radio base station at the central site will be common to all remote radio sites, so duplicate transceivers with automatic changeover facilities are proposed to improve the resilience of the system.

Evaluation of Optical Fibre Option

Optical fibre technology is now regarded as the most powerful and versatile communications medium available. It presented a potentially attractive alternative to radio, provided we could use the 33 kV overhead lines feeding the oil field water supply wells and remote degassing stations system as either communication bearers or as a means of mounting the optical fibre cable systems. Optical fibre systems have been in service for many years and are very reliable as long as due care is exercised during installation of the cable and its jointing.

The merits of fibre-optic cable links are:

  • Long distance transmission without repeater, typically 120 km (72 miles)
  • Immunity to electromagnetic interference
  • Extremely large potential bandwidth, typically 100 GHz/km (0.6 miles)
  • No approval required from the radio regulatory authority (unlike radio systems).
There are three basic types of aerial optical fibre cable for use on overhead power lines:

  • Composite optical ground wire (OPGW), which is basically optical fibres integrated within the static ground wire (i.e., earthwire). It can be used in place of a conventional earthwire.
  • Optical fibre cable attached to the earthwire by either wrapping or lashing.
  • All Dielectric Self-Supporting (ADSS) optical fibre cable suspended below the phase conductors between the power line supports.
Optical Ground Wire. It is generally accepted that the OPGW is the most effective type of optical fibre cable although, for an existing overhead power line, its use means the existing earthwire must be scrapped.
OPGWs are manufactured with mechanical and electrical characteristics similar to conventional earthwires. In many cases, the OPGW can be manufactured such that its diameter and weight is equivalent to that of the earthwire being replaced, so it will not affect the applied loading on the overhead line supports. The optical fibres, typically between 4 and 24 of them, are contained either in a metal tube or in a slotted metal spacer, depending on the manufacturer’s design, set within the metallic strands that make up the earthwire. The overall construction is designed to ensure total immunity of the communication circuits from the effects of short circuits on the power system and lightning strikes.

Installation of OPGW is basically similar to that of conventional earthwire. Figure 2 shows the mounting position of OPGW on a typical single pole structure at the oil field.

Of the three basic types of aerial optical fibre cable, OPGW has the longest service history. So far, more than 11,000 km (6,600 miles) of OPGW cables have been installed worldwide by one manufacturer alone. OPGW provides the best environment for the optical fibres because it protects them from man, nature and the elements. Reported OPGW problems/failures are rare.

Costwise, OPGW is the most expensive. Also, at lower voltages the power circuits must be disconnected during installation, which sometimes may be highly undesirable for operational reasons.


Figure 2: Installation Method for Optical Ground Wire (OPGW) Cable

Figure 3: Installation Method for Lashed Cable
Lashed/Wrapped Cable. Lower cost alternatives to OPGW are the so called “wrap” and “lash” cable systems. In both systems the basic cable is formed out of a plastic tube that contains the optical fibres. The cable is attached to the earthwire either by wrapping it spirally or by lashing it to the earthwire. In the latter case, the cable and the earthwire remain parallel and either a continuous spirally wound tape is applied to keep the two in the required position or separate metallic spirals are applied to clip the optical fibre cable to the earthwire. The lashed type of installation is illustrated in Figure 3.

Lashed or wrapped optical fibre cable is a commonly adopted solution for retrofitting existing lines as long as the earthwire and tower structure can withstand the additional mechanical loading. Such a cable is necessarily of a relatively light construction and requires very careful installation to avoid subjecting the optical fibres to excessive mechanical stress. There is also a greater risk of damage from short circuits or lightning, as compared to OPGW.

With lashed cables, the area that is subjected to wind forces is considerably larger than that of the original earthwire. This lashed arrangement also creates an aerofoil section that causes lifting of the amalgamated cable/earthwire under high wind speed conditions. This lifting can give rise to galloping of the optical fibre cable and the earthwire, which can cause damage to either or both components.

It is generally possible to install the optical fibre cable with the power circuit remaining energised although, for safety reasons, the electrical clearance necessary for spirally wrapping either the optical fibre cable or the support wrap usually precludes this on voltage lines below 66 kV. Other arrangements for installing earthwire supported cable using manually applied pre-formed spiral clips or other suitable devices should permit live-line working. Live-line installation will be considerably more costly because of the extra safety precautions that must be taken.

Once installed, the cable is maintenance free generally, although support taping and clips have failed on various of the lashed systems; the wrapping technique has also had its failures. The installed cost, however, is generally less than OPGW, even allowing for the additional cost of live-line installation.


Figure 4: Installation Method for All Dielectric Self Supporting (ADSS) Cable
All Dielectric Self-Supporting Cable. The ADSS was developed without any metal so that it could be installed parallel to the phase conductors. Normally, the ADSS is mounted on the overhead line support structure and strung below the bottom phase conductor of the overhead line, as illustrated in Figure 4.

The ADSS has to be self-supporting, so tensile members are needed to strengthen the cable. As a result, the overall diameter of ADSS cable is generally larger than that for the wrapped/lashed type for an equivalent optical fibre count. Wind effects are noticeable on the relatively large-diameter ADSS cable, so careful checks must be made on the capability of the supporting structures.

ADSS cable is set at a lower height than the phase conductors, thus reducing the additional overturning moment from the ADSS. On the other hand, installation below the phase conductors may give lower than desirable ground clearance which, due to prevailing site conditions, can be reduced even further by drifting sand.

The ADSS format is generally considered to be the next best after the OPGW as an environment for optical fibres. Experience on extra high voltage power lines has shown, however, that deterioration of the sheath material caused by a phenomenon known as “dry band arcing” can result from the cable being subjected to high electric field strength (due to its physical location in relation to the phase conductors). This concern makes ADSS cable more suitable for use at voltages of 132 kV and less.

ADSS is suitable for live-line installation provided there is sufficient electrical clearance for safe installation. Overall, ADSS costs about the same as lashed-type cable—the cable itself tends to be more costly but installation is generally simpler and less costly.

Telecommunications Network Design

The cost of the optical fibre cable will represent the major proportion of the cost of an optical fibre communication system, so we optimised the cable route to provide communications for all sites with the minimum length of cable. An optimised route also offers the highest resilience of the communication system.

The logical route would follow the perimeter power lines; with the optical fibre being looped into each of the remote sites fed from the main power ring. A complete fibre ring permits communication in either direction, so there is inherent redundancy, and communication to all points on the ring can be maintained in the event of a failure at any point.


Figure 5: Proposed optical fiber telecommunications network
We considered a number of optical fibre network configurations, each having its advantages and disadvantages. The preferred optical fibre telecommunications network (Figure 5) requires the least amount of optical fibre cable, 170 km (102 miles). It consists of two separate optical fibre rings, each of which has almost half the total number of RTUs. Although a single cable failure on one of the optical fibre rings can affect two remote RTUs, we do not consider this to be a major drawback.

At each remote site, an optical line terminal equipped with the necessary interfaces is required. Each remote terminal acts as a node on the optical fibre ring. At the central site, master optical fibre node equipment is required for each optical fibre ring.

Conclusion

In view of the significant initial capital cost advantage that optical fibre options have over radio, and the very substantial technical superiority of a fibre solution, we concluded that an optical fibre based communications system should be used for the new water injection SCADA system at the oil field. We further considered that the technical advantages of OPGW more than offset any cost premium over the other types of lashed or ADSS cables installation, providing that operational constraints permit the necessary power line outages could be arranged.

A technical presentation was given to the client in March 1999. The client concurs with the findings and recommendations detailed in our conceptual study report and is currently making arrangements to proceed with the implementation of the new water injection SCADA system.

Kwok-Hong Mak is a Chartered Engineer and a member of the Institution of Electrical Engineers, UK. His areas of specialization are in communications and control systems including fibre-optic communications, microwave radio links, VHF/UHF mobile radios, SCADA systems, digital transmission and telephony equipment for applications in electricity supply and transportation industries. Recently, he prepared a technical specification for a fibre-optic communications system for speech and data facilities based on the synchronous digital hierarchy (SDH) technology for the Syria 400 kV power transmission network.

<< Go To Previous Article | Table Of Contents | Go To Next Article >>
Go To Other Issues | Contact PB Network | Print This Article 
Markets  |  Services  |  About Us  |  People + Careers  |  News + Events  |  Research Library  |  Projects
Worldwide Locations  |  Contact PB  |  Legal Notice  |  Site Map  |  Home
© Parsons Brinckerhoff