Parsons Brinckerhoff
Worldwide LocationsContact PBLegal NoticeSite MapHome
PB Websites search Advanced Search
MarketsServicesAbout UsPeople and CareersNews and EventsResearch LibraryProjects
PB Network Email This Page
Go To Other Issues | Contact PB Network | Print This Article 
<< Go To Previous Article | Table Of Contents | Go To Next Article >>
Making Better Communities Through Contextual Infrastructure Planning
March 2001 • Issue No. 49 • Volume XVI • Number 1
Land Use and Growth Management
Highway 99W Trip Budget Model
By Lawrence M. Conrad, Portland, Oregon 1-503-417-1362, conradl@pbworld.com
What can be done to improve travel conditions in an area when funding for major infrastructure is not available and no alternative routes exist? PB's trip budget model is helping local agencies find the answers to that question that are best for their communities.

Small towns in rural areas often face similar situations-their primary road functions as both Main Street and state highway, and the competing needs are rarely complementary. Local officials would prefer to develop land parcels along the corridor to serve local economic development needs, thus creating additional demands on the roadway, while the state has a strong interest in maintaining high service levels.

This was the situation facing the City of Sherwood and the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) along Highway 99W when ODOT directed PB to create a simple tool that it and the city could use to track the impact land use approvals on Highway 99W. The model we developed generates estimates of the number of trips that would result from land use development proposals based on the characteristics of the development and the capacity of the highway.


Figure 1: Six Segments of Highway 99 Analysis
The Issues and Constraints

Sherwood is a small town located just outside the Portland metropolitan area, where many of Sherwood's residents work. Many of these residents commute on Highway 99W, which functions as Sherwood's most important arterial. A majority of new commercial development is located on or very near the highway and a substantial supply of vacant buildable land still exists in Sherwood, so as this land is developed there will be even greater use of the highway. Recently, the town required that a developer install a new traffic signal on Highway 99W to make it easier for residents living in new developments in the southern part of Sherwood to travel to existing commercial areas by way of the highway.

From ODOT's perspective, Highway 99W provides the main access between I-5 and a number of towns to the south and west of Portland. Traffic volumes on this roadway have grown steadily in recent years. Highway 99W is also one of the three corridors that link the Portland area to the Oregon coast. Weekend recreation traffic produces large traffic volumes, but the primary congestion problems on the Portland/Sherwood stretch of Highway 99W occurs during the weekday PM peak hour commute.

The issues we examined included the:
  • Absence of alternative routes, which compels Sherwood residents to use Highway 99 for local trips
  • Increasing through traffic on the highway
  • New land use approvals with direct and indirect access onto the highway
  • Lack of local, county or statefunding to make major infrastructure improvements.
Short-term infrastructure solutions were not available, so we suggested developing a planning tool that would allow both Sherwood and ODOT to assess the impact of proposed development in order to allow better management of the existing facilities. Both parties agreed to this approach.

Developing the Trip Budget Model

The trip budget model can be used to generate scenarios that compare traffic impacts of different types of land uses along a corridor, such as the effect of altering the mix of office, retail, and residential mixes. The model is intended to function for up to six years, after which cumulative changes in conditions will require that new trip estimates be prepared.

The model uses information from five sources:
  • The regional transportation model, which enabled us to derive evening peak-hour trip estimates for the current year
  • The regional geographic information system (GIS), which provided information at the parcel level on the supply of vacant land in Sherwood
  • The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook (5th edition, 1991), which provided trip generation rate estimates for new developments
  • The city's planning department, which provided a list of pending and approved land use actions by parcel
  • Traffic engineering reports developed for land use proposals, which included the directional allocations of trips along the highway.
Trips predicted for previously approved but not yet constructed land developments were added to the estimates of current traffic, along with the forecasted growth in the number of through trips. Subtracting the total estimated number of trips from the total capacity produced the remaining trip budget. Based on the location of the four major intersections, Highway 99 was divided into six segments (Figure 1 on the previous page) and capacity was estimated for each segment.

We used GIS to identify all vacant, developable parcels within 1220 m (4,000 feet) of the highway. These lots were classified by zone and grouped into eleven trip generation areas, each of which feed traffic onto the highway at one of the major intersections. The ITE Trip Generation Handbook rates were used to estimate the trips produced by proposed land uses. The only trips accounted for by the model were those leaving a trip generation area and using the south bound lanes during the evening commute.

In the future, whenever a new land use proposal is considered, it can be entered into the model and the resulting changes in the trip budget summary can be determined. This ability allows for the rapid creation of development scenarios in the city.

Although running the model is fairly straightforward, there is quite a bit of subtlety possible in its application. For example, the capacity information for a given model run is dependent upon a number of assumptions that can be changed, leading, in turn, to substantially different outcomes. The creation of a new signalized intersection at the last major unsignalized intersection on Highway 99W, for instance, would require adjustment to several of the model's assumptions.

Model Will Assist Policy Makers

Using the model for information about the amount of capacity available on a highway implies that policies will need to address how capacity will be allocated over time. There are several possibilities listed below, many of which can be used in combination.
  • Allocate everything on a first-come/first-served basis until capacity is used up
  • Allocate a predetermined percentage each year
  • Adopt trip caps by parcel
  • Adopt a permitting system that scores projects based on their traffic impacts.
At some point, the full capacity of a highway to carry traffic will be reached. That point is not entirely fixed, however, and numerous actions can be taken by governing agencies to stretch the capacity of a highway, including the following:
  • Change land use designations. Retail land uses tend to generate the highest number of trips while residential and non-retail commercial uses generate far less. Zoning alterations can therefore be an effective way of decreasing traffic impacts of development. This strategy (as well the one that follows) offers both ease of implementation and an effective approach to decreasing the traffic impacts of development.
  • Identify less trip-intensive zoning along the highway and rezone the land directly adjacent to the highway.
  • Implement impact fees to pay for capacity improvements. (Clarification as to whether impact fees can be gathered for a state facility would be needed first, however.)
  • Develop site planning standards to minimize impacts to the highway.
  • Adopt the lowest possible level of service (LOS) standard. (Metro, the elected regional government that is responsible for transportation and land use planning for three Oregon counties and twenty-four cities, including Sherwood, has proposed a 2-hour LOS is E/F)
  • Buy the direct access rights to Highway 99W for specific parcels along the corridor to minimize new trips directly entering the highway.
  • Construct local street projects to serve local traffic and thus take local trips off the highway.
Many of these actions were previously discussed by ODOT, the city and PB, but it was decided to develop the model to track the changes over the next few years.

The model is a simple planning tool for tracking the impact of land use approvals along a highway. It can be adapted for use in a variety of similar situations where a state highway functions as an urban arterial.

Larry Conrad is a Lead Planner with extensive experience in planning and research in the public and private sectors. He was a principal author of the report entitled "Full Cost of Alternative Land Use Patterns" (Federal Highway Administration), for which he developed a prototype model (SCALDS) to estimate the full cost of alternative land use patterns at the metropolitan planning organization (MPO) level. His experience includes land use planning at the city, county, and regional levels, facility planning, public involvement coordination, economic and fiscal analysis, and the creation and operation of a geographic information system (GIS) for a city.
<< Go To Previous Article | Table Of Contents | Go To Next Article >>
Go To Other Issues | Contact PB Network | Print This Article 
Markets  |  Services  |  About Us  |  People + Careers  |  News + Events  |  Research Library  |  Projects
Worldwide Locations  |  Contact PB  |  Legal Notice  |  Site Map  |  Home
©2009 Parsons Brinckerhoff