Parsons Brinckerhoff
Worldwide LocationsContact PBLegal NoticeSite MapHome
PB Websites search Advanced Search
MarketsServicesAbout UsPeople and CareersNews and EventsResearch LibraryProjects
PB Network Email This Page
Go To Other Issues | Contact PB Network | Print This Article 
<< Go To Previous Article | Table Of Contents | Go To Next Article >>
Sustainable Development
November 2004 • Issue No. 59 • Volume XIX • Number 3
Transportation
Sustainable Highways: Oxymoron or Opportunity?
By Hal Kassoff, Washington, D.C., 1-202-783-0241, kassoff@pbworld.com
The author accepts the special challenge for highways when it comes to sustainability and lays out opportunities for and responsibilities incumbent upon highway planners, designers, builders and owners to engage in practices that result in sustainable highways. These concepts are the foundation for the highly successful workshop that he developed and leads on sustainable highways for transportation professionals.

There are advocates of sustainability who seem to believe that the only good highway is the one left unbuilt. Certainly, even the strongest highway supporter would acknowledge projects and practices that have been harmful from an environmental or community perspective. On the other hand, we know that well conceived and well planned highways have added to the quality of the natural and community landscape and to the quality of our lives.

We know also that the basic values, philosophy and practices of transportation professionals have been undergoing dramatic change. In the U.S., state departments of transportation have launched initiatives individually as well as collectively through the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) that exemplify the principles and the practical advantages of “environmental stewardship.”

Environmental Stewardship

Environmental stewardship is described as “…protecting and enhancing the environment, and ensuring that transportation projects benefit communities now and for generations to come.” These are two breakthrough concepts.

Enhancing the Environment. When the federal “enhancement program” was incorporated into ISTEA (Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act)1 in 1991 many opposed the idea, saying that it diverted scarce resources away from much needed infrastructure improvements. This opposition has not only disappeared, but the philosophy of enhancement—making our communities and the environment a bit better rather than a bit worse—has become a mainstream idea.

Enhancement does not have to be a budget-busting concept. For example, a 2 percent enhancement that exceeds expectations as compared to falling short by 2 percent may amount to only a 4 percent difference, but that difference can be huge in terms of the perceptions of highways that are imparted.

Accommodating Future Generations. In taking the long-term view that accounts for “generations to come” and in launching related initiatives, such as the creation of an AASHTO-sponsored Center for Environmental Excellence and the rapidly evolving practice of context-sensitive solutions, the U.S. transportation community is moving closer and closer toward the broader idea of sustainability.

Taking the Opportunity

We in the highway community have the opportunity to demonstrate that our very best life-cycle engineering and environmental stewardship practices can result in sustainable highways that not only meet structural, safety and service requirements, but go a step beyond in creating outcomes that are “better than before.” To do so, we must promote highway projects that:

  • In function and form are consistent with and supportive of environmentally sensitive land use and transportation plans and policies
  • Link seamlessly and efficiently with and make maximum use of all existing elements of the transport network, including rail, air, water, bus, carpooling, bicycling and walking
  • Are designed with the full participation of interdisciplinary professionals and with the active participation of people who are affected
  • Incorporate designs and specifications that reflect a life-cycle asset management perspective2
  • Maximize the use of recycled construction materials without compromising the physical quality or integrity of the built product
  • Incorporate construction methods that require the least disruption and disturbance
  • Move expeditiously through a streamlined development and delivery process.

For the full potential of sustainable highway practices to be achieved, it is important that associated land use and conservation planning is also focused upon sustainability objectives. While these functions are not under the purview of transportation agencies, highway officials can and should be proactive in encouraging such an integrated approach toward sustainable development outcomes.

Moving Forward

The time has come to offer a definition of “sustainable highways” and to initiate a dialogue. One possible definition would be:

Highways that from conception to completion, through maintenance and operation, satisfy life-cycle functional requirements for service, safety and structural durability while conserving resources and improving our natural, built and social environments.

It is hoped that other versions will be offered and the definition debated and refined. Such a process will sharpen our focus on what constitutes sustainable highways and would signal that the debate within our business no longer centers on whether, but rather on how, to define, develop and deliver highway projects that we and the customers we serve can proudly embrace as sustainable for generations to come.


Hal Kassoff is senior vice president and program area manager for highways of PB, Washington, D.C.

Ed note: (1) This article is an abridged version of an article that was published in the September 2002 issue of World Highways magazine and was the foundation of Hal's keynote speech of the same title for the November 2004 conference in Wellington, New Zealand, "Toward Sustainable Land Transport." The speech builds upon many of the ideas of the articles and is much expanded. For those interested, it is available from Hal upon request at Kassoff@pbworld.com. (2) For other PB Network articles by Hal Kassoff, please see “Making Highway Design More Context Sensitive: Key Challenge in the New Millennium,” Issue No. 49, March 2001, pp. 6-8; and “The Tr u t h about Congestion and Congestion Man agement,” Issue No. 43, 4th quarter 1998, pp. 8-10, 13, and 49.

1 Passed by the U.S. Congress in 1991, ISTEA authorized an overall expenditure of $155 billion for transportation projects over a six year period, and reshaped transportation policy by encouraging innovative approaches to the planning of coordinated intermodal networks designed to move people rather than vehicles. The legislation was renewed in 1998 for six years as TEA-21 (Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century), and the latest 6-year transportation bill is currently under consideration.

2For more information on asset management, please see “Sustainable Highways and Asset Management” by Wayne McDaniel.

<< Go To Previous Article | Table Of Contents | Go To Next Article >>
Go To Other Issues | Contact PB Network | Print This Article 
Markets  |  Services  |  About Us  |  People + Careers  |  News + Events  |  Research Library  |  Projects
Worldwide Locations  |  Contact PB  |  Legal Notice  |  Site Map  |  Home
© Parsons Brinckerhoff