Parsons Brinckerhoff
Worldwide LocationsContact PBLegal NoticeSite MapHome
PB Websites search Advanced Search
MarketsServicesAbout UsPeople and CareersNews and EventsResearch LibraryProjects
PB Network Email This Page
Go To Other Issues | Contact PB Network | Print This Article 
<< Go To Previous Article | Table Of Contents | Go To Next Article >>
Sustainable Development
November 2004 • Issue No. 59 • Volume XIX • Number 3
Transportation
Sustainable Highway Practices On The Fort Washington Way Reconstruction Project
By Alfred B. Craig, Cincinnati, Ohio 1-513-639-2121, craig@pbworld.com
Sustainability of this major highway reconstruction project in downtown Cincinnati was met through improved qir quality, improved quality of life, cost savings, and shortest possible duration of construction.

When Cincinnati’s Fort Washington Way (I-70 and US 50) opened in the early 1960s it could safely accommodate 90,000 vehicles per day. By the 1990s, this major downtown artery was carrying more than 120,000 vehicles each day. Heavy traffic congestion, dangerous weaves and pedestrian safety were quickly becoming problems during rush hour and times of special downtown events.

In 1995, the Ohio, Kentucky, Indiana Council of Governments (OKI) conducted a major investment study (MIS) for improvements to Fort Washington Way. Twenty five alternatives were developed by the project’s many stakeholders in highly collaborative process and evaluated based on several factors—land use, pedestrian access, potential for riverfront development, local access, safety, and overall roadway performance.

Five proposed alternatives were studied further, leading to the selection of a well-supported, locally preferred alternative. The City of Cincinnati, as agent for Ohio Department of Transportation then selected PB to serve as program manager for the $146 million reconstruction.


Figure 1. Fort Washington Way before(left) reconstruction and after(right).

Figure 2: Artist’s rendition illustrating connectivity to riverfront area and two new stadiums.

Figure 3. Cross-sectional view showing multi-modal transit station below ground.

Sustainability Built In

The ways in which we achieved sustainability in some of the major project elements are described below.

Improved Pedestrian Access. The new design improves access to Cincinnati’s riverfront by reducing the width of the highway trench and providing a more pedestrian-friendly connections from the downtown. New bridges at Main, Walnut, Vine, Race and Elm Streets have wider sidewalks and at-grade pedestrian connections to the riverfront, are significantly shorter, and were designed to enhance the pedestrian experience.

Less Room Devoted To Highway. Reduction of the overall width of the highway resulted in the reclamation of 75-m to 90-m (250-foot to 300-foot) –wide area) between Elm and Sycamore streets, provided an additional 15-20 acres of land in Cincinnati’s riverfront area for future development, and allowed for increased flexibility for development south of the new Fort Washington Way. As examples, the new National Underground Railroad Freedom Center, which will be located on land formerly occupied by Fort Washington Way, will serve as a catalyst for urban renewal in the downtown area along the Ohio River. Two new sports stadiums and a new riverfront park will also be built in this area.

A New Gateway to Cincinnati. The reconstruction of Fort Washington Way provided a unique opportunity to rebuild Cincinnati’s historic connection to the Ohio River and to create a new and monumental gateway to Cincinnati from the interstate highway system (Figure 1). These goals were achieved by the construction of five new bridges across the narrowed Fort Washington Way. The three center bridges accommodate generous sidewalks and landscaping. The two end bridges at Elm and Main have cable suspended pedestrian structures to provide vertical landmarks at either end of the project, and incorporate the light cannon (search light) features previously developed as part of the Cincinnati Gateway Program.

The five blocks between these landmark bridges are treated with unique light fixtures, sculptural benches and special paving, and are planted with double rows of trees to create a grand civic entrance to Cincinnati. Second and Third Streets have become a pair of grand boulevards where residents and visitors alike can easily orient themselves to the downtown, new stadiums, a riverfront entertainment district, and riverside open space.

Riverfront Transit Center. Originally the newly created Second Street was to be constructed on an earth embankment that would serve as flood protection for the Fort Washington Way road trench. As design for riverfront development continued, however, it was determined that existing transit infrastructure had to be demolished, so Second Street was redesigned to accommodate a multi-modal transit station below (Figure 2). It included an 8-m (26-foot) -wide sidewalk on a multi-functional bridge that could accommodate future light rail anywhere on the top portion of the structure and still function as the ceiling of the future multi-modal transit station below. The design incorporated arched precast girders, or tees, that support the bridge deck and are an architectural highlight of the transit center below.

As a result of this project, local transit agencies will see significant operational improvements. With the addition of the new transit center, Cincinnati Metro and the Transit Authority of Northern Kentucky (TANK) will be able to reduce the 90 minutes it takes to transport 90,000 people to or from Cincinnati’s riverfront to approximately 45 minutes. In addition, the new transit center will be safer for downtown pedestrians because they will be on Second Street above and separated from bus traffic.

Combined Sewer Overflow (CSO). A CSO system added as the project progressed resulted in cost savings of $20 million to the City of Cincinnati because it was done in conjunction with construction of the Fort Washington Way project. The CSO will serve approximately 410 acres of property extending beyond the riverfront and several blocks into the downtown area, and is expected to limit the number of times sewage mixed with storm water overflows into the Ohio River from approximately 149 times each year to less than five. It is designed to carry the “100-year storm,” an improvement from the original design.

Future Deck. Portions of the area over the Fort Washington Way roadway trench were considered for public use in the future so foundation work that could support a future deck was incorporated, greatly facilitating the exercise of this option. By using a precast girder design similar to the new cross-bridges, the deck can be constructed with little disruption to the central business district or to traffic. This investment will substantially reduce the cost of actual construction if the deck is installed.

Schedule Innovations. One of the largest social and economic considerations of the Fort Washington Way reconfiguration program was the schedule. The public wanted us to get the job done as quickly as possible. A normal schedule for a project of this scope would be three years for design and property acquisition, and six more years for construction. A typical compressed schedule would be two years for design and three years for construction. Instead, the entire project was to be completed by August 2000, less than three years from start of design to opening the roadway for traffic.

Conclusion

The transportation goals of the region were met in a way that met the triple bottom line considerations. None of this would have been possible, however, without adequate funding and cooperation among stakeholders. The Kentucky Transportation Cabinet (KYTC), ODOT, Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Governments, City of Cincinnati, Hamilton County and Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority (SORTA) forged a partnership to accomplish the funding goal. It was the first time that funds from KYTC were used on an Ohio project.

In addition, cooperation among reviewing agencies was extremely important. We used a fast-track design review process where ODOT and KYTC participated in every step to keep the project on its fast-track schedule of less than three years.

Another critical factor was that construction managers and designers on the project team participated in an interactive continuous design/constructibility interface process. The construction managers constantly challenged the designers to make their designs faster, easier and cheaper to build, and the designers accepted these challenges.


Fred Craig is a civil engineer who specializes in program management. An assistant vice president and senior project manager, he has been with PB for nearly 10 years.

<< Go To Previous Article | Table Of Contents | Go To Next Article >>
Go To Other Issues | Contact PB Network | Print This Article 
Markets  |  Services  |  About Us  |  People + Careers  |  News + Events  |  Research Library  |  Projects
Worldwide Locations  |  Contact PB  |  Legal Notice  |  Site Map  |  Home
©2008 Parsons Brinckerhoff